#Adobe dng converter lens correction pro#
#Adobe dng converter lens correction software#

Who knows what will be both available and better for you in a few years time? You wouldn't want to have to switch s/w again.

#Adobe dng converter lens correction software#

You can look at getting new software that copes better with your new camera if and when the situation arises, but in the meantime it is probably not worth abandoning the software you know prematurely. Still, that's a better situation than we had in the past where a new version of Ps and Lr were effectively made compulsory because the ACR plugin would not handle new cameras even if it could have been made to do so.i suppose too that such a policy is more risky now that the alternatives to Adobe s/w have improved significantly. It still is to some extent, but I'm sure that Adobe have said they will always make new camera and lens updates for the existing ACR/Lr6/PsCS6 available the only catch will be that sooner or later there will be some new ACR features that will not be backwards compatible with old ACR, Lr and Ps. When they analyse your new camera they may ignore your favourite lens, and when they analyse your new lens they may ignore your favourite old camera.Īs for DNG Converter, it's significant advantage was that it can make modern camera raw file date compatible with old versions of Ps and Lr.

#Adobe dng converter lens correction pro#

Pro and cons both ways, but DxO have always had a very hard time keeping up with the combinations. Adobe seems to keep the lens and camera corrections separate. $99 to own outright, and it has a comparable feature set to Lightroom, including support for plugins and levels, but does not require importing files before one can start reviewing them, which is why I stopped using Lightroom and do not use CaptureOne.ĭxO OpticsPro can only work its best magic for specific camera/lens combinations that DxO have analysed. DXO OpticsPro has the most extensive lens correction database for cameras and lenses. DNG downgrades the information from the RAW file and key settings can be lost and DNG is an Adobe specific file format whereas TIFF is public domain and a mainstream format. I use DXO OpticsPro and Photo RAW 2017 and Nikon's Capture NX-D to convert from RAW to 16-bit TIFF. I guess you can say I do since I use a lightroom to convert my raw to dng dng conversion for my raw files of my Olympus EM1 MKII and it works well for me. Awesome.)ĭXO has been my go to for the best output. (If I have a RAW that needs the very best rendering, I go with DXO 11. In the future, who knows? Note there are many viable alternatives now. I know it won't go past the 1Dx MkII and the 5DsR, but I don't buy new $6k cameras on a yearly basis. (And ignore the rudeness of some responders! ) You might want to look at alternatives- Capture One Pro, DXO, Affinity, on1 Photo Raw, Luminar, etc. Why do you insist on living in the Stone Age? 'Does everyone pretty much use the Adobe DNG converter ?'

I have since bowed to the giant and subscribed to CC 2017. I used to use it, but for me, it was a PITA. How much of a pain is it to convert and then do your changes in Photoshop ? So If your ever getting newer camera equipment is this what pretty much everyone does ? Just wondering, because right now I have the hard copy of CS6 and don't ever plan on going to the cloud version. Does everyone pretty much use the Adobe DNG converter ?.