Acrosync promotional code software#

and Borg is already notoriously inefficient in it's CPU usage when looking at object throughput (restic: 'fast, efficient'?). It uses far more CPU than Borg in almost all tests. I'm really surprised at restic's performance. For a network-based test, not only time is interesting, but total RX/TX as well. This is of course difficult because these tend to be bad on reproducibility. a typical fast internet connection (say 100/40 or 50/20 MBit/s) with a few dozen ms latency to some server or cloud service. My two (possibly biased, much like the author's) cents. You of course have the right to choose any license you like! I just wouldn't use duplicacy myself under the terms of that license.

Acrosync promotional code software#

As it stands, you may at any point stop accepting license payments from a commercial user and they'd lose the right to use it entirely - they'd lose access to their backups (unless they used the software without a license). I can't even, say, create a package for it and get it included in Debian.Īnd aside from some of these practical issues, I'm a personal user who supports software freedom so I don't want to use something encumbered in this way.Īnd as a commercial user, any development contributions I make are no longer my own and I have to pay to make use of them.īut the worst part of it is, your license isn't very well defined. I'd lose rights to any development contributions I might have made unless I pay.Īnd as a personal user, I can't use any code from Duplicacy in any other project. It matters to me as a personal user because my use of duplicacy might change at some point and suddenly I'd lose rights to use it (unless I pay).